Thread: Courts and Kids
View Single Post
Old Apr 24, 2010 | 01:50 PM
  #21  
Isaac.Hunt's Avatar
Isaac.Hunt
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: Here and there ...
Default

Originally Posted by ben_frst
incorrect the mum wold get the same benifit no matter what so the kids wouldnt be affected in any way


being self employed you can fook the csa off at a whim, when we split last year my g/f said she did not want them chasing me at all as we had a good thing going and she didnt want to spoil it due to my violent history and unpredictable behaviour (not towards her) even tho there was no issue i paid her every week as i still do now even though were together
Just to be overly pedantic as you are obviously keen to spread incorrect information.

Prior to april this year, where a man paid child support to a mother reliant on benefits, the mother would only receive £20 a week before it affected her benefit payments. That is still £80 a month she would be down if the father did not pay due to his whims and reckon.

However now, you are entirely incorrect as from april child support is entirely disregarded for the calculation of any benefits a mother receives. So a child will be out of pocket for whatever sum is unpaid by a father.

If the mother is working (many do) then missing maintenance payments would represent a loss to the mother's household income and thus would have the potential to negatively impact on a child.

Futhermore, the CSA can (although I think it is for a 2 year trial period) remove driving licences and passports without a court order for unpaid maintenance, in addition to the deduction of earnings orders/interim charging orders etc they can impose via court.
Reply