Originally Posted by
danneth
they used the same machine for all the tests
6 months and shutdowns and blue screens? reason for this is what? as ive never had it
viruses and spayware slowing your pc down same again? i think your judging us with maybe what you have gone through in the past?
as for the windows vs mac
dont forget the rest of your graphs from that review
"It's also worth keeping in mind that both operating systems were tested in their "clean" state (fresh and with a minimum number of apps installed) and using Mac hardware, which is naturally optimized for Snow Leopard. As you use them, the performance will change, most likely for worse because of software clutters gathered over time. It's hard to measure which one gets more affected by this than the other. However, when Apple allows installing OS X on PC hardware, I'll for sure run the same tests again."
anyway as i was saying lets just say for arguements sake they were dead level in performance why on earth would you spend 3x as much???
I so agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it's I have a Mac, to make you look good....!!!!!!!
They are wank over priced Shit.
get over it, you can get Windows PC's with better hardware than Mac at a lot less, HP workstations are the very good with 3 years warranty can crapintosh beat that?
If you buy Mac it's for one reason only, Making you look cool to people who know nothing.
sorry I work in the publishing industry and Mac's are gone, they have no point, chuck in a HP worktation you will find even the hardcore Mac person will say Indesign works better on a PC.