Originally Posted by
Ebonycossie4x4
both machines cannot have been equally specced, also it does not take into account in 6 months time you have various blue screens and shutdowns.
Multiple viruses and a shitload of spyware slowing down youre system
they used the same machine for all the tests
6 months and shutdowns and blue screens? reason for this is what? as ive never had it
viruses and spayware slowing your pc down same again? i think your judging us with maybe what you have gone through in the past?
as for the windows vs mac
dont forget the rest of your graphs from that review
"It's also worth keeping in mind that both operating systems were tested in their "clean" state (fresh and with a minimum number of apps installed) and using Mac hardware, which is naturally optimized for Snow Leopard. As you use them, the performance will change, most likely for worse because of software clutters gathered over time. It's hard to measure which one gets more affected by this than the other. However, when Apple allows installing OS X on PC hardware, I'll for sure run the same tests again."
anyway as i was saying lets just say for arguements sake they were dead level in performance why on earth would you spend 3x as much???
