Originally Posted by
wozzy
All this talk about transmission losses and percentages being different etc looks to me to be more a case of certain people suggesting marks engine dyno figures are 'fudged'. His engines have proven themselves time and time again so i dont see the need to constantly query what figures his engines make. Cant remember exactly but didn't one of his 500/500 engines go from engine dyno to dd dyno and only loose 5bhp or somthin?? i would think that would be proof enough for most people
never said i didnt believe the engine dyno plot and have also said more than once what an engine and id be happy myself if it were mine..the argument is from me anyway that its less in the car..not a slating about yum or dave or marks engine as they wouldnt give a toss now as the car is in bits!!!!
cheers danny