Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I was just trying to point out that our "history" has no relevance on this thread, and FYI, I wasn't the one that brought this up YOU were
.
Mike, its clear to me our history is in your reasoning, maybe not to others.
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
And please advise how the above is abuse of moderation powers? When there is an issue with the fact that someone could potentially be mislead by another member, it is our duty to protect board members from people like this.
Please dont kid yourself, the only person you were worried about in that matter was yourself
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
As to my accusation, I think you might find that this is well supported now
.
Why ? Because You, Stu and Chip say so ? All 3 that have personal and/or business bias in this matter..LOL
Wheres the proof since my recent statement that I have tried to sell this or any part of it to anyone ? - I havent and wont do !
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
FYI I will always moderate posts objectively or where this is impossible, request help from other mods. However, what I WON'T do, is moderate a thread that I believe I could not do objectively (Chip's recent outbursts being a point of proof of this
).
Apart from that one incident back then, I fully agree
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
As to the bias you feel you are receiving, as I said, this is only because you are a known "troublemaker", and are treated as such (along with several others that post in the same vein as you), so don't feel singled out - you're not that special
.
Not that special...Hah !,
Thats why all the moderators have been asked to watch me.
Also, I am aware that my PM's are being monitored. ..
As for being a "trouble maker", I will complain about things I dont agree with.
I have done so in the right room in a calm and collected manor without resorting to insults.
