I wasnt saying he was in the wrong, I was just saying that the timing of the thread is unfortunate for Doug as he isnt around for 3 weeks to defend himself, so that gives everyone else carte blanche to slag him off for 3 weeks based on one side of a story.

For exmaple, I know that at one point Doug was using a courier through a friend of his's account as it got him better prices, so its perfectly possible that Doug gave the dash to this person, and then they didnt drop it down in time, so the first time the actual courier saw it was a couple of days later, im not saying that is the case, but I think that outright calling him a liar without Doug (who ultimately is the only person who knows the story of how the dash got from him to the customers) giving the facts is a bit unfair.

We've had loads of these threads where everything is very clearcut and definately the company is at fault, and the passionford Jury have already ruled for execution, then when the company in question come on and explain their side of the story, suddenly its a very different case.

I think its unfair to make too many judgements without knowing both sides, thats all Im saying.