seeing as we're being bombarded by propoganda these next two weeks, heres some stuff you won't see on the news (well some of it was on the news).
The FBI, have admitted that there is "No hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 911"
http://www.washingtonfreepress.org/8...Evidence.shtml
I spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."
Kean and Hamilton (of the 911 Comission) have written a book, on how testimony supplied by the FAA and NORAD, was false.
(3 minutes long, DEFINITELY worth watching)
The US Transport Dept has has urged the FAA to consider disciplining two executives who failed to correct false information provided to the commission that investigated the September 11 attacks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/02/wa...in&oref=slogin
Ex Colonel Robert Bowman is running for congress in 2008, with 911 as one of his election issues.
http://bowman2006.com/issues_az.htm#9_11
9/11: The truth about 9/11 is that we don’t KNOW the truth about 9/11, and we should. I will sponsor (and have already lined up co-sponsors for) legislation initiating a truly independent investigation of 9/11. There is mounting evidence of complicity by elements of our own government...... (cont)
Also, Republican candidate Mary Maxwell has spoken out.
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/...31/-1/business
A Republican candidate for this area’s congressional seat said Wednesday that the U.S. government was complicit in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In an editorial board interview with The Telegraph on Wednesday, the candidate, Mary Maxwell, said the U.S. government had a role in killing nearly 3,000 people at the World Trade Center and Pentagon, so it could make Americans hate Arabs and allow the military to bomb Muslim nations such as Iraq.
Here's an audio clip of one of the Popular Mechanics staff (US magazine), squirming, on a radio phone in show.
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/aud...0823-am-c3.MP3
(Not Verbatim)
Caller:" What does Popular Mechanics make of the reports of some of the highjackers being alive"
PM:"Well DNA was recovered from the debris to enable the scientists to identify them"
Caller:"How did they get the DNA in the first place, to match the DNA from the debris to confirm"
PM:" Umm, err, ummm........ can I rephrase that question".......
Host "No, you can't"
NIST have released a rebuttal of Controlled Demolition theory, in this "FAQ". Must be pushing some buttons for them to do this. Only trouble is, they have dug themselves a bigger hole.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Anyone watch the Naudet 911 thing Saturday night? Some very telling things carefully edited out. Heres one of them....
Big 3 page article in Time magazine.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...1304-1,00.html
A member of a 911 board, has managed to get the Flight Data Recorder details through a FOIA request. It was supplied in the form of an animation, and has been posted up on YouTube. (The animation has a commentary about "Able Danger" dubbed over it.) Anyone here know what "Able Danger" is?
Only problem is, it does not correlate with the "famous" four frame "video" released by the Pentagon.
Feel free to debunk point by point.
