Old Sep 28, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #27  
Cam's Avatar
Cam
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield
Default

Originally Posted by NORTH YORKS RS SPARES
Cam
You mean replies from idiots like YUM , who dont know all the facts and just presume he has the means to decide who is right and who is wrong ???????
No not at all. The way Neil responded when he eventually did respond was taking the fucking piss and making out like what I had said was bullshit. Have you noticed that his response in this statement doesn't actually address the true issue - namely what I stated being true.

Originally Posted by NORTH YORKS RS SPARES
Im not saying either party is right or wrong as i dont know the facts myself so because of this i will not respond with childish remarks until i do
The situation is pretty clear now Paul but I understand you not wanting to commit to any side but the facts are -
1, Neil got the money
2, Neil spent the money
3, 10 months later I still dont have my money back
4, I think I have been more than reasonable and then to have the kind of replies I initially got from Neil.was a piss take.


Originally Posted by NORTH YORKS RS SPARES
ps,
Sorry but i also find it hard to understand how the first post ,by Cam lasted 5 pages and 5000 views before removed ( and then only removed by Cams wishes ) and yet Neils reply was removed within hours
Seems unfair to me as 5000 people saw the Cam post and yet it has been removed i understand in normal sercumstances Neils might as well be removed but in this case i feel it should be put back so that 5000 people can see his reply as he has the right to try to explain his side .
Paul
As Neil hasn't addressed the issue publically but rather asked questions about whether there is anyone else who has complaints of a similar nature, the effect abusive emails/pms have had that were nothing to do with me and requested other customers who were satisfied to post I dont see his statement as particularly relevent other than an attempt to change the direction to the effect its had on him.
What *should* have been stated by Neil imo is what he is planning to do to rectify the situation about the return of the money.
Reply