Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects. Restoring her to Concourse? Just getting her running again? Or got a mad project? This is your room.

Dax Cosworth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 06:35 PM
  #41  
jontysafe's Avatar
jontysafe
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 469
Likes: 9
From: Marlborough
Default

There is still something else definitely going on his engine or set up you've got to admit that! Just changing the turbo isn't going to change that unless you get your mits on the mapping and set up of course.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 07:50 PM
  #42  
20/20 vision's Avatar
20/20 vision
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 267
Likes: 16
From: it's not where you are, it's where you've been and where you hope to be
Default

Originally Posted by jontysafe
There is still something else definitely going on his engine or set up you've got to admit that! Just changing the turbo isn't going to change that unless you get your mits on the mapping and set up of course.
well the oracle has spoken but you're still not a believer!

i will update this thread in a month or so if you wish when its running again. there are a number of people on here who swear by the 7064 but i cant find anyone on here or in the wider world apart from you who swears by the 7163 on a 2 litre and as far as i understand, you haven't even run one yet?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 08:01 PM
  #43  
jontysafe's Avatar
jontysafe
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 469
Likes: 9
From: Marlborough
Default

Literally thousands of them out there on subarus and evos in USA.

the 7064 May well suit a yb better than the 7163, but a Yb that is boost restricted throughout the rev range?

dont get me wrong I'm not a knobber and I totally hope this new turbo sorts the whole issue. I just have a wee feeling that your tuner who couldn't use his det cans probably has a lot to answer for!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 08:10 PM
  #44  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

I dearly want to upgrade to a long stroke 2.2 or 2.4 but I know I will most likely lose my 7064 and I do not want to lose the throttle response. I will probably accept 470 bhp and keep the turbo than go bigger and have 500-550 plus......although a mental 600-640 is still interesting
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 08:20 PM
  #45  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack
I dearly want to upgrade to a long stroke 2.2 or 2.4 but I know I will most likely lose my 7064 and I do not want to lose the throttle response. I will probably accept 470 bhp and keep the turbo than go bigger and have 500-550 plus......although a mental 600-640 is still interesting
I think the 7670 on one of my engines will be pretty special. It already is on the evos I do with that on it.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 08:25 PM
  #46  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Do you think that on alloy block we will not lose low torque and throttle response by upping cc and turbo size?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 08:33 PM
  #47  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack
Do you think that on alloy block we will not lose low torque and throttle response by upping cc and turbo size?
The stroker motor I do is stunning you would be amazed at the diff.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 08:37 PM
  #48  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
The stroker motor I do is stunning you would be amazed at the diff.

Mark
Can't wait to do it then. Once my chassis is sorted I think we will get going with the parts gathering.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2017 | 07:29 AM
  #49  
Max Dax's Avatar
Max Dax
Thread Starter
Virgin
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Zeeland
Default

Thank you all for the comments and remarks.
Lots to learn.

The cooler is a 4x4, will try to duct the air more into the cooler to force the air through it and see what the temp. will do. As mentioned: maybe the “contacttime” in the cooler will be to short + most wind will go over the body but let’s see what it brings.
Manifold was bought from Oppliger and indeed I had to cut of the external waste gate.

Try to make everything fit at the moment. (oil, water and air + bodywork, all body work will be made from carbon as soon as the shaping and dyno is done.)



Reply
Old Jan 29, 2017 | 07:43 AM
  #50  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Looks good. Does carbon fibre heat transfer like alloy or stainless? With the end tanks poking out in the wind I wonder if you can get the cooling there too?

My end tanks have rubber over them to seal the front of the car and force air through the cooler but I wonder if I should expose the tanks more?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2017 | 12:08 PM
  #51  
Max Dax's Avatar
Max Dax
Thread Starter
Virgin
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Zeeland
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack
Looks good. Does carbon fibre heat transfer like alloy or stainless? With the end tanks poking out in the wind I wonder if you can get the cooling there too?

My end tanks have rubber over them to seal the front of the car and force air through the cooler but I wonder if I should expose the tanks more?

Aluminum for sure is much better than Carbon for cooling (carbon doesn't transfer heat), but I can’t weld aluminum
As mentioned before, if there is a vacuum behind the cooler your good but if there is overpressure it first has to be compensated before the flow will go through the cooler I guess.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2017 | 07:52 PM
  #52  
20/20 vision's Avatar
20/20 vision
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 267
Likes: 16
From: it's not where you are, it's where you've been and where you hope to be
Default

Originally Posted by Max Dax
As mentioned before, if there is a vacuum behind the cooler your good but if there is overpressure it first has to be compensated before the flow will go through the cooler I guess.
earlier on i mentioned the 'scoop' that dax originally supplied. this sat between where your intercooler is and the cam pulleys and directed the air exiting the cooler upwards through a cut out in the bonnet. they also provided a 'splitter' which went on top of the rad and 'split' the air entering the nose cone between the rad and the cooler. the whole thing didnt work very well however
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2017 | 06:02 PM
  #53  
mattman1234's Avatar
mattman1234
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 967
Likes: 23
From: kent
Default

here's my setup

Last edited by mattman1234; Mar 27, 2018 at 05:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2017 | 06:22 PM
  #54  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Just drive it like that, job done
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2018 | 05:38 PM
  #55  
mattman1234's Avatar
mattman1234
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 967
Likes: 23
From: kent
Default

Max Dax,,,,any more progress on your car ?
Reply




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:18 PM.