General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

E46 M3 v's FRS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22-06-2008, 10:39 PM
  #41  
Alps Pacino
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Alps Pacino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 8,968
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Steven_RW
I read most of this so far:

The m3 is "reasonable" up to 100 mph. |I am sure that a lighter weight 310 bhp and 300 ish lbft frs is atleast as fast if not faster. When you engage 4th in the M3 and hold it to *k u are at 140 mph and it really gets its legs then. Most cars struggle to beat that (normal is motors of course), whereas beating one up to 100 is not a bad effort, beating one once it gets its legs is a bit trickier.

Handling on mine is quite good.

I had a run with a big kawa bike the other day, started at 90 mph, I got a wee jump on him and he pulled away strong but the fact I was doing 160 and still accel after him means that for him to get proper away, he would have had to be willing to do quite a bit more than 170mph sustained round bends on the motorway etc and needless to say ( not that I blame him! ) he decided that was enough and backed off.

Get the M3 on tesco 99 ron and ask the guy for a proper run up to some reasonable speeds, would be interested to hear how u got on.

Cheers for now

RW
I beat an m3 on my old gixxer 600 down the motorway so i doubt you would get anywhere near the likes of a zx10r in an m3
Old 23-06-2008, 01:26 PM
  #42  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S3an
the top speed on a e46 is 191mph(derestricted) i beleive..[/IMG]
337bhp will not give anything like that top speed, not here on Earth anyway.
171ish maybe.
Old 23-06-2008, 02:27 PM
  #43  
Rippers
Monte Geek
 
Rippers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cheshunt, Herts
Posts: 8,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When my Monte was Stage three I asked my mate to race me in my own E46 M3 and the Esc would pull away from the M3 everytime
Old 23-06-2008, 02:50 PM
  #44  
AndyBrew
Advanced PassionFord User
 
AndyBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leicester
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C4llyT
The planet where F1 cars are rwd, you?

M3 or Focus for handling, is a tough one....
where did F1 cars come into it

my point was that an FRS is one of the best handling front wheel drive cars you can buy and can be pretty quick in the right hands and would in no way be embarrassed by an M3, and if the driver of the FRS was half handy would probably piss all over an M3 if say I was driving it, that works both ways obviously but my point was and still is a 310/310+ FRS is most definately a match for a standard M3 all day everyday

but I do conceed an FRS would struggle to keep up with an F1 car
Old 23-06-2008, 02:55 PM
  #45  
pani_k
PassionFORD Member
iTrader: (1)
 
pani_k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Both different leagues of car imo and for what the FRS is, it is an awesome piece of kit. Like comparing an F1 car to a rally car.
Old 23-06-2008, 03:14 PM
  #46  
Spammage
Regular Contributor
 
Spammage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southend On Sea
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nothings impossible and the frs is a good handling car no reason it couldn't pull away from an M3

according to http://www.m3zine.com/index.php/E46-M3.html
the m3 weighs 3400 lbs which works out to 1542 Kg's abit heavier than the FRS.So that works out at 216 Bhp per ton whearas a FRS with 310BHp weighing 1230 kgs would be 252 BHP per ton so quicker in a straight line and probably just as handy round the bends.
Old 23-06-2008, 03:14 PM
  #47  
Crowder
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Crowder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very believeable. In my old 300bhp rs i used to embariss a mates 350bhp evo and 330 bhp subarus etc above 50mph. Another good friend had an m3 csl and wasnt very happy with how close it was LOL. Cracking cars once in 2nd. Best was a 996 911 turbo 40-110 there was really not a huge amount in it after that though he changed gear and fucked off
Old 23-06-2008, 03:22 PM
  #48  
TurboShed
Cossiemodo
 
TurboShed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pani_k
Another interesting fact about the top gear lap time is that the BMW 535D M sport went round quicker than the FRS did. Shows how much diesel is coming on nowadays and the 5 series is a huge lardy thing and did the same lap time as an M3!

BMW M3 1.31.8
Nissan 350Z 1.31.8
Mazda RX-8 1.31.8
BMW 535d 1.31.8
BMW 130 1.31.9
Ford Focus RS 1.32.2
Yeah but come on, this is Top Gear not a laboratory.
Old 23-06-2008, 03:24 PM
  #49  
Jim Galbally
20K+ Super Poster.
 
Jim Galbally's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i dont understand the "a FRS handles really well therefore it'll embarrass an M3" mentality

do you know what an E46 M3 is?

do you know what it was designed to do?

it is without a doubt amongst THE BEST handling sports coupe's ever made, it will actually go round a corner
Old 23-06-2008, 03:26 PM
  #50  
Jim Galbally
20K+ Super Poster.
 
Jim Galbally's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

here's a pretty good comparison, nurburgring production lap times

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordsch..._car_lap_times

BMW E46 M3 - 7:50
Ford Focus RS - 9:05


yeah, those M3s have shit handling
Old 23-06-2008, 03:41 PM
  #51  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Galbally
i dont understand the "a FRS handles really well therefore it'll embarrass an M3" mentality

do you know what an E46 M3 is?

do you know what it was designed to do?

it is without a doubt amongst THE BEST handling sports coupe's ever made, it will actually go round a corner
Yeah, but we're comparing it to a front wheel drive driving school/shopping run car, it just won't be a patch on it!
Old 23-06-2008, 03:49 PM
  #52  
pani_k
PassionFORD Member
iTrader: (1)
 
pani_k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But people are comparing a RWD German Sports Coupe made for both luxury and cruising with a 3.2 6 pot 343bhp engine with...

A FWD 2.0 4 pot turbocharged hot hatch that makes 212bhp as standard.

You can get a good low miles M3 for what Ł16-Ł18k or so at the moment. Maybe Ł20k plus for a 20-30k mileage one with the SMG box etc etc.

You can also get a good low miles FRS with maybe some mods here and there or even standard with low miles for Ł12-Ł14k. Spend Ł3-Ł5k or so on the FRS and I'm pretty sure it could give an M3 a run for its money both handling wise and straight line speed.

And it's FWD as well so that's another handicap.
Old 23-06-2008, 03:54 PM
  #53  
Crowder
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Crowder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The rs as standard is pants with 212bhp mine last 24hours before it was remapd, decated and airfilterd to more like 260 then it starts getting htere! Around a track i was bullying r34 gtrs, pulsars, 4x4 cossies, escos's etc yeh ok on the straight the r34s destroyed it but bring a few corners back and for a fwd car theyre fantastic. I'd go as far to say that my evo was only a tiny bit better in the dry than the frs...
Old 23-06-2008, 04:03 PM
  #54  
focuschivvy
Advanced PassionFord User
 
focuschivvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: west mids
Posts: 2,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its all about the drivers too! i was pulling away from a 350 brake evo 6 in mine, cause the bloke couldnt drive for toffee! took him about 5 seconds to change gear then when it came to the corners.....well....good god put a decentdriver in the evo and he wudda run rings around me all day long
Old 23-06-2008, 04:51 PM
  #55  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Little brother had an Evo TME, I've never been so scared as when he went round bends and roundabouts, just a physics defying car.
To say a focus was only just not as good in the dry is mental - fwd vs 4wd rally car with AYC making it get round.
I'm no nervous passenger, but that evo and bends was something else.
Old 23-06-2008, 05:07 PM
  #56  
Spammage
Regular Contributor
 
Spammage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southend On Sea
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Galbally
i dont understand the "a FRS handles really well therefore it'll embarrass an M3" mentality

do you know what an E46 M3 is?

do you know what it was designed to do?

it is without a doubt amongst THE BEST handling sports coupe's ever made, it will actually go round a corner
Shouldn't you be on passion bmw or something why don't you educate us on what it was designed to do i personally do not know the exact intetions of the designers when they were producing the M3 but obviously speed and handling were in mind which i'm guessing is what the designers of the rs had in mind. I don't think the M3 is the only car which can "go round a corner". Also the lap times you posted for the nurburgring were obviously for standard cars but were/i'm not talking about a standard foci but one with an estimated power output of 310bhp and i believe in the right hands could get round the 'ring just as quickly if not faster than a standard e46 m3.
Old 23-06-2008, 05:09 PM
  #57  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Last paragraph: http://www.usautoparts.net/bmw/model...m3_e36_pg2.htm

And things move on....
Old 23-06-2008, 06:25 PM
  #58  
Jim Galbally
20K+ Super Poster.
 
Jim Galbally's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

spammage, we've already showed that the FRS has more bhp per tonne than the E46 m3, and as having some small knowledge of the track itself, i don't beleive adding 50 off bhp to one would knock off 1.10


look, ive been in a FRS, and i was EXTREMELY impressed with the way it handles, the diff kinda pulled the front end into the corner where the steering input alone was insufficient. also the punchyness and acceleration were extremely impressive, certainly as quick as my e36 (which is slower than an e46). a very "chuckable" hot hatch for sure

i have also been in many an E46 m3, and they handle SUPERBLY, the ease at which it will go round a corner is inspiring. you just put on the steering angle, aim for the apex, and apply power, its like the car is speaking to you and saying "i could have gone round that SO much faster, try harder..."

so let's summarise

the FRS is a great car
the E46 M3 is a great car

a stock M3 will go round the nurburgring and topgear testtrack quicker than a FRS

you can make a FRS go faster
you can make an M3 go faster

does that pretty much sum it up
Old 23-06-2008, 06:32 PM
  #59  
AndyBrew
Advanced PassionFord User
 
AndyBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leicester
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Galbally
here's a pretty good comparison, nurburgring production lap times

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordsch..._car_lap_times

BMW E46 M3 - 7:50
Ford Focus RS - 9:05

yeah, those M3s have shit handling
the phrase "touched a nerve" springs to mind
Old 23-06-2008, 06:33 PM
  #60  
Jim Galbally
20K+ Super Poster.
 
Jim Galbally's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

why would it touch a nerve, i don't have and E46 M3
Old 23-06-2008, 06:41 PM
  #61  
SapphyMike
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
SapphyMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 9,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ateotd, its still a Focus RS boy racer car

and the M3 isnt much better

M5 FTW!
Old 23-06-2008, 06:56 PM
  #62  
Spammage
Regular Contributor
 
Spammage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southend On Sea
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Galbally
spammage, we've already showed that the FRS has more bhp per tonne than the E46 m3, and as having some small knowledge of the track itself, i don't beleive adding 50 off bhp to one would knock off 1.10


look, ive been in a FRS, and i was EXTREMELY impressed with the way it handles, the diff kinda pulled the front end into the corner where the steering input alone was insufficient. also the punchyness and acceleration were extremely impressive, certainly as quick as my e36 (which is slower than an e46). a very "chuckable" hot hatch for sure

i have also been in many an E46 m3, and they handle SUPERBLY, the ease at which it will go round a corner is inspiring. you just put on the steering angle, aim for the apex, and apply power, its like the car is speaking to you and saying "i could have gone round that SO much faster, try harder..."

so let's summarise

the FRS is a great car
the E46 M3 is a great car

a stock M3 will go round the nurburgring and topgear testtrack quicker than a FRS

you can make a FRS go faster
you can make an M3 go faster

does that pretty much sum it up
Fair enough fella
Old 23-06-2008, 07:03 PM
  #63  
dreamin
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
dreamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: essex!!
Posts: 3,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just thought id chuck this into the equation,

how much was an e46 m3 NEW
how much was a FRS NEW ,

around double the price iirc

so comparimg the 2 cars really is pointless but good to see fords (modded or not) still able to create convo's like this
Old 23-06-2008, 07:06 PM
  #64  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dreamin

so comparimg the 2 cars really is pointless but good to see fords (modded or not) still able to create convo's like this
The 150k mile rusty blown 4x4 box calibra turbo I had which had a chip, fmic, and squashed fpr would have worried an E46 M3 in a straight line, hardly a big deal.
Old 23-06-2008, 07:27 PM
  #65  
danneth
TORQUE!
 
danneth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 11,756
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Galbally
here's a pretty good comparison, nurburgring production lap times

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordsch..._car_lap_times

BMW E46 M3 - 7:50
Ford Focus RS - 9:05


yeah, those M3s have shit handling

all these figures getting thrown about, so my standard CTR is 18 secs quicker then an FRS round the ring
Old 23-06-2008, 07:53 PM
  #66  
Steven_RW
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Steven_RW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Alps Pacino
I beat an m3 on my old gixxer 600 down the motorway so i doubt you would get anywhere near the likes of a zx10r in an m3
I dont recall saying I was anywhere near him.

Fact, if I am doing 160 mph u need to be doing 180 mph to get away any reasonable distance (IE over the horizon and far away) he pulled a good few hundred meters, but then a corner in the M'way arrives, he has to lift (he must be registering 180 odd) and I dont lift, all of a sudden u are back together again.

Thats all pretty factual and I have raced plenty of bikes. They are very very very quick - lower down they are so much faster than a normal car its scary and pointless - U can only play with them in the upper speeds due to stability of car and the fact that to really annihilate a car doing 160 on the way to 170 is to be going so much faster for a reasonable length of time and most roads dont allow it, most riders wont do it either. I always just try and get the car to the highest speed possible quickly as anything below 100 they uber warp u

It didn't look like a 600 but I couldnt get alongside to see. Second note - it was much faster than me and for a car to do what it did to me - it would have to be a REALLY quick car.

Just talking about the long legs on an M3.

One last thing - I would say the M3 could get to about 180 speedo which is about 170 irl - not this 191 talk - no chance - never in a million years.

Cheers!

RW
Old 23-06-2008, 08:02 PM
  #67  
Crowder
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Crowder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C4llyT
Little brother had an Evo TME, I've never been so scared as when he went round bends and roundabouts, just a physics defying car.
To say a focus was only just not as good in the dry is mental - fwd vs 4wd rally car with AYC making it get round.
I'm no nervous passenger, but that evo and bends was something else.
Cally bearing in mind i've had a 2 frs, 240/STD all the way through to 300bhp and a 330bhp evo 5 mate i reackon i can comment! indry other than launching there aint much in it with the rs was running hr 25mm springs and paradas

Crowds.
Old 23-06-2008, 08:04 PM
  #68  
Crowder
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Crowder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Galbally
spammage, we've already showed that the FRS has more bhp per tonne than the E46 m3, and as having some small knowledge of the track itself, i don't beleive adding 50 off bhp to one would knock off 1.10


look, ive been in a FRS, and i was EXTREMELY impressed with the way it handles, the diff kinda pulled the front end into the corner where the steering input alone was insufficient. also the punchyness and acceleration were extremely impressive, certainly as quick as my e36 (which is slower than an e46). a very "chuckable" hot hatch for sure

i have also been in many an E46 m3, and they handle SUPERBLY, the ease at which it will go round a corner is inspiring. you just put on the steering angle, aim for the apex, and apply power, its like the car is speaking to you and saying "i could have gone round that SO much faster, try harder..."

so let's summarise

the FRS is a great car
the E46 M3 is a great car

a stock M3 will go round the nurburgring and topgear testtrack quicker than a FRS

you can make a FRS go faster
you can make an M3 go faster

does that pretty much sum it up
Agreed jim but an rs costs small cash to get to 300bhp same as gaining 20 on an e46. not many rs's are standard.

Dont get me wrong i love m3#s and so nearly made myself bankrupt at 21 buying my mates csl wish i had!
Old 23-06-2008, 09:34 PM
  #69  
Jim Galbally
20K+ Super Poster.
 
Jim Galbally's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

danneth, those are FULL LAP times. do not compare them to bridge to gantry times that us tourists use
Old 24-06-2008, 07:24 AM
  #70  
Spammage
Regular Contributor
 
Spammage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southend On Sea
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I allways wondered that cos on the top gear one with clarkson in the jag you can see he enters at the end of the long straight and the come off at the beginning ahh it all makes sense now!!!
Old 24-06-2008, 12:11 PM
  #71  
AndyBrew
Advanced PassionFord User
 
AndyBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leicester
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by H15 FSC
i had a play today with a E46 M3 and beat it down this duel carrage way to about 100 then had to brake hard,
my car is probly 310 BHP put a post up on the RSOC and they all seem to think im lying bout this, ive had a races with m3's in my stage 3 cossies and beat them ,
i know a lot of people have got or had m3's what do u think
they say he wasnt trying but he hit the limiter of the island and could see he was gunning it
I draw your attention to the original thread, basic opinion appears to be that yes a solid 310hp FRS would spank an E46 M3 to 100mph and if not it would be pretty damn close. We then get the normal BMW fan club slagging off the FRS and suggesting that an FRS can't drag its ass around a corner and then some bollox about an F1 car

maybe the way to deal with the thread would of been a. not to justify why the M3 is better in every way other than what the question was about or b. except defeat graciously
Old 24-06-2008, 12:19 PM
  #72  
pani_k
PassionFORD Member
iTrader: (1)
 
pani_k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyBrew
I draw your attention to the original thread, basic opinion appears to be that yes a solid 310hp FRS would spank an E46 M3 to 100mph and if not it would be pretty damn close. We then get the normal BMW fan club slagging off the FRS and suggesting that an FRS can't drag its ass around a corner and then some bollox about an F1 car

maybe the way to deal with the thread would of been a. not to justify why the M3 is better in every way other than what the question was about or b. except defeat graciously
Old 24-06-2008, 12:24 PM
  #73  
RichardPON
20K+ Super Poster.
 
RichardPON's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 23,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Having driven a few heavily modified Focus RS's and a few M3s, I don't see how it could possibly be "spanked" anywhere.

No doubt that there wouldn't be much in it either way, but out of the two cars, no real driver is ever choosing a FWD Focus.
Old 24-06-2008, 12:40 PM
  #74  
pani_k
PassionFORD Member
iTrader: (1)
 
pani_k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Everybody knows the M3 is the better all round car, but this is a fucking Ford enthusiasts site and everybody is firing cheap shots in the way of the FRS and bumming the M3 up its tailpipes . Why can't people accept that the guy outdid an M3? Is it that much of a shock that it's unacceptable?
Old 24-06-2008, 01:11 PM
  #75  
RichardPON
20K+ Super Poster.
 
RichardPON's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 23,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Outdid him in what way?

Pulled a car length over 4 gears? Lapped Castle Combe 10 seconds quicker?
Old 24-06-2008, 03:37 PM
  #76  
AndyBrew
Advanced PassionFord User
 
AndyBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leicester
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"i had a play today with a E46 M3 and beat it down this duel carrage way to about 100 then had to brake hard"

there you go Rich just in case you missed it
Old 24-06-2008, 03:49 PM
  #77  
Turbosystems
Super Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
Turbosystems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: home
Posts: 12,849
Received 50 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RichardPON
Having driven a few heavily modified Focus RS's and a few M3s, I don't see how it could possibly be "spanked" anywhere.

No doubt that there wouldn't be much in it either way, but out of the two cars, no real driver is ever choosing a FWD Focus.
they'd choose an mr2
Old 24-06-2008, 04:16 PM
  #78  
danneth
TORQUE!
 
danneth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 11,756
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Galbally
danneth, those are FULL LAP times. do not compare them to bridge to gantry times that us tourists use

but on that site you linked me too im seeing?


8:47 Honda Civic Type-R 200PS/1204KG Horst von Saurma
Sport Auto 11/01


9:05 Ford Focus RS 215PS/1355KG

Sport Auto 09/05

or am i missing something?
Old 24-06-2008, 04:23 PM
  #79  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crowder
Cally bearing in mind i've had a 2 frs, 240/STD all the way through to 300bhp and a 330bhp evo 5 mate i reackon i can comment! indry other than launching there aint much in it with the rs was running hr 25mm springs and paradas

Crowds.
Was your ayc fucked, or are you just a shit driver?
Old 24-06-2008, 04:26 PM
  #80  
Jim Galbally
20K+ Super Poster.
 
Jim Galbally's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

danneth i thought you meant your personal car and your own laptimes


Quick Reply: E46 M3 v's FRS



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:21 PM.