Replacing fuel lines with aeroquip hoses........
Will -6 hose fit into the original fuel line clips under the car or will i need to fit new ones? If whats teh best way of doing this (water tight seal etc)
Cheers,
Dan
Cheers,
Dan
Originally Posted by lloyd
-6 will not fit the original clips.easy way is use zip ties around the old clip.best way is to use p clips
Ginge - no engine didn't stop it passing the last two times
I assume by using zip ties it would fail?
dan it would fail with no metal lines if done proper mate, not having a dig just food for thought, all my cars pass that way too when i cant be arsed to fix em, dont mean that i would use something that is blaitantly a fail to get a friendly mot person in trouble or cause a issue i the interest in "bling"
use rubber pipes under the car for all i car, just dont cause a huge fireball when i look in my rear view mirror ( as we all know you drive too slow to cause danger to any person in a fast car
)
use rubber pipes under the car for all i car, just dont cause a huge fireball when i look in my rear view mirror ( as we all know you drive too slow to cause danger to any person in a fast car
)
you do waffle shit Ginge! 
My complete fuel system is aeroquiped... had its MOT the other week. Blokes comment was around the lines of "Its passed.. infact.. has it been used since it was built! "

My complete fuel system is aeroquiped... had its MOT the other week. Blokes comment was around the lines of "Its passed.. infact.. has it been used since it was built! "
Trending Topics
Never knew that! It would take a hell of a crash to damage braided fuel lines though and I dont think the metal equvilant would be any better off!
I've certainly never heard of anyone failing an mot due to braided fuel lines
the word you are looking for is sensibly mate
I've certainly never heard of anyone failing an mot due to braided fuel lines
as we all know you drive too slow
Ginge.. you are the kind of person I despise! 
swearing that you're right when you're clearly wrong.. I dont mean that the rules are wrong.. they probably stipulate that metal lines are required.. BUT
you CAN get an mot.. because I DID get an MOT!
100% pass! .. well.. 97% the headlights aim needed adjustment
JESUS christ!

swearing that you're right when you're clearly wrong.. I dont mean that the rules are wrong.. they probably stipulate that metal lines are required.. BUT
you CAN get an mot.. because I DID get an MOT!
100% pass! .. well.. 97% the headlights aim needed adjustment
JESUS christ!
In many way, aeroquip fuel lines are superior to metal pipe in so much as they wont be crushed/flattened, and don't crack/split in the event of an accident.
Regardless of an MOT "Guideline", it will pass.
Regardless of an MOT "Guideline", it will pass.
dave the point was the WONT ALWAYS PASS IT !!!!
imagine he fitted the lines and then he got told sorry sva rules state all cars must have metal lines, its a fail
what happens then
hence why i mentioned it, hes got it covered, fair play, hell so have i
but dont mean its LEGAL!!!!!
hyrdrolic hand brake is the next question i wonder about too, that can pass but is that legal
remeber there trying to bring in SVA for all modded cars where that may be a issue but thats not a problem at the moment
im mere pointing out the option to think of thats all
why does giving people honest info that can affect saftey get a hard time, spout crap about oil damaging engines and they get
hard work aint the word
imagine he fitted the lines and then he got told sorry sva rules state all cars must have metal lines, its a fail
what happens then
hence why i mentioned it, hes got it covered, fair play, hell so have i
but dont mean its LEGAL!!!!!
hyrdrolic hand brake is the next question i wonder about too, that can pass but is that legal
remeber there trying to bring in SVA for all modded cars where that may be a issue but thats not a problem at the moment
im mere pointing out the option to think of thats all
why does giving people honest info that can affect saftey get a hard time, spout crap about oil damaging engines and they get
hard work aint the word
thinkthe areoquip is to do with the sagging of em over the solid lines not the actual amount of presure it can hold
unclil metal line, nothing moves much, clip the quip and it MAY droop
unclil metal line, nothing moves much, clip the quip and it MAY droop
Originally Posted by Rick
Why use aeroquip on the straight bits? It should only be used on the flexible sections, as copper pipe doesnt expand at all, and you get a better pedal feel.
Ian - your car is tooooooooo clean! Stupid question but how did you attached the alloy spacers to the body? Just use a longer grub screw and tap the none hole side?
Not wanting to upset the apple cart...but stainless steel overbraid PTFE lined brake lines are unacceptable on a road car officially...never heard it about braided fuel lines and ive SVA'd a few cars with braided fuel lines but they have run internally rather than externally but the brake lines in PTFE stainless overbraid are defo (illegal). With regard to the argument over use of briaded lines....Subuaru WRC cars are now mainly plumbed in solid lines...brakes & fuel....but it is a weight reduction and perfomance factor...nothing to do with SVA or MOT...
IMO Braided hoses still look the best.....
IMO Braided hoses still look the best.....
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
From: Northampton
Originally Posted by DanS
Ian - your car is tooooooooo clean! Stupid question but how did you attached the alloy spacers to the body? Just use a longer grub screw and tap the none hole side?

Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
From: under the cabby... i think.
so are you all saying you can use this sort of stuff
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...MEWA%3AIT&rd=1
as this is what ive just bought
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...MEWA%3AIT&rd=1
as this is what ive just bought
Looks very good Ian.
I've been told to try and stay away from jubilee connections on non standard hoses but I take it you haven't had any problems?
Also, thinkauto say to to use the aeroquip banjo connection on fuel or high pressure applications? god knows why... any ideas?
I've been told to try and stay away from jubilee connections on non standard hoses but I take it you haven't had any problems?
Also, thinkauto say to to use the aeroquip banjo connection on fuel or high pressure applications? god knows why... any ideas?
I have to agree with Ginge on this one Im afraid ... As I mentioned to Dave when he did hs I too was of the understanding flexible fuel lines under the car were a theoretical MOT failure...
Same as having No CAT on a post 93 car too I suppose though
damo edit that post before anyone reads it
as i said before fair play if hes got it sorted and aint got a issue as dans car is not a rot box nor a death trap and he does drive like a pus,,,,,,, sorry safely
just we aont all got connections, people like me have to remove there ABS as they get failed on it not working proper
supose its secret jealousy
as i said before fair play if hes got it sorted and aint got a issue as dans car is not a rot box nor a death trap and he does drive like a pus,,,,,,, sorry safely
just we aont all got connections, people like me have to remove there ABS as they get failed on it not working proper
supose its secret jealousy
Just read this and would like to ask how many of the people saying that aeroquip pipes are MOT failure are actually MOT nominated testers???
I am and have been for 5 years, It's Bollocks!!! You can only fail a car if it meets the VOSA "reason for rejection" and the book only says as follows:
Method of Inspection
Running the engine
This inspection is to be carried out both with and without the engine running.
1. Check the following for leaks or insecurity:
a. fuel tank Reason for rejection a. fuel leaking
b. all visible fuel hoses, pipes and unions Reason for rejection b. a fuel system component insecure.
c. all visible fuel components
Opening the luggage compartment
It may be necessary to open the luggage compartment to carry out a full inspection of the fuel system.
2. Check fuel tank cap for positive fit and condition of sealing washer and flange.
Reason for rejection
a. fuel cap does not fasten sercurely- by a positive means, or- such that pressure is not maintained on the sealing arangement
b. fuel cap sealing washer torn, deteriorated or missing, or a mounting flange/sealing method defective such that the leakage of fuel is possible
Locking fuel caps
If access cannot be gained to the fuel cap because it is locked and the key is not readily available or because it cannot be opened for some other reason see heading 2 of the introduction of this manual.
So IMO Dan fire away son with your Aeroquip pipes!
I am and have been for 5 years, It's Bollocks!!! You can only fail a car if it meets the VOSA "reason for rejection" and the book only says as follows:
Method of Inspection
Running the engine
This inspection is to be carried out both with and without the engine running.
1. Check the following for leaks or insecurity:
a. fuel tank Reason for rejection a. fuel leaking
b. all visible fuel hoses, pipes and unions Reason for rejection b. a fuel system component insecure.
c. all visible fuel components
Opening the luggage compartment
It may be necessary to open the luggage compartment to carry out a full inspection of the fuel system.
2. Check fuel tank cap for positive fit and condition of sealing washer and flange.
Reason for rejection
a. fuel cap does not fasten sercurely- by a positive means, or- such that pressure is not maintained on the sealing arangement
b. fuel cap sealing washer torn, deteriorated or missing, or a mounting flange/sealing method defective such that the leakage of fuel is possible
Locking fuel caps
If access cannot be gained to the fuel cap because it is locked and the key is not readily available or because it cannot be opened for some other reason see heading 2 of the introduction of this manual.
So IMO Dan fire away son with your Aeroquip pipes!
a fuel system component insecure.
then explain to me why they use solid lines under the car,,,,,,, is that cause if a plastic clip snaps then the pipe dont hang
not all mot testers are purley " yes it meets the standard"
some look at the mods and wonder if theres a chance its not as secure as before
ive seen a car fail when it technically shouldnt but it did
steve why give it up, it states secure, i also never said it woul have problems but he might
he said that he wont for other reasons so fair play to him
just how many would have just cable tied the lines under the car
he said that he wont for other reasons so fair play to him
just how many would have just cable tied the lines under the car
a car CANNOT fail if its notin the reasons for rejection column
you cant just fail a car because this might happen or that might happen - if its not in the manual it DOESNT FAIL - simple as
you cant just fail a car because this might happen or that might happen - if its not in the manual it DOESNT FAIL - simple as
Originally Posted by markk
a car CANNOT fail if its notin the reasons for rejection column
you cant just fail a car because this might happen or that might happen - if its not in the manual it DOESNT FAIL - simple as
you cant just fail a car because this might happen or that might happen - if its not in the manual it DOESNT FAIL - simple as
aslong as its secure and safe then dont worry about it
Originally Posted by markk
a car CANNOT fail if its notin the reasons for rejection column
you cant just fail a car because this might happen or that might happen - if its not in the manual it DOESNT FAIL - simple as
you cant just fail a car because this might happen or that might happen - if its not in the manual it DOESNT FAIL - simple as
Ginge, even if the tester was not sure if he should fail it or not, he/she is advise by VOSA to "pass and advise."
Ginge, even if the tester was not sure if he should fail it or not, he/she is advise by VOSA to "pass and advise."
thats really not what happens at work as i asked about somink they wasnt sure off as as so they just said "if i dont find it safe i aint passing it, end of"
thats really not what happens at work as i asked about somink they wasnt sure off as as so they just said "if i dont find it safe i aint passing it, end of"
the one i asked about btw was the abs light, my car dont actually have one so theres not a light but theres abs and the rules are it mist come on for 20 seconds and go out
i dont have the light on my dash though so its a fail, even if the brake test is fine
but as said some mot places do use the rules to interpret there own version as i thought that if theres no light theres no test
i dont have the light on my dash though so its a fail, even if the brake test is fine
but as said some mot places do use the rules to interpret there own version as i thought that if theres no light theres no test






