FAO ALL: New picture resizer. PLEASE test & comment
Thread Starter
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Ok,
The last resizer we had caused problems with a few browsers and also slowed the load down and technically loaded the page twice so we removed it and Pet worked on a new one.
Now, the pictures will all load into a 640x480 thumbnail.
When you move the mouse over the thumbnail it will jump up to the size it was originally uploaded at.
Try it here:
https://passionford.com/forum/viewto...r=asc&start=40
Remember, you will have to get into the habit of keeping the mouse to the left or right of picture topics if we keep this mod so the pics scroll by undisturbed on your screen.
I like it LOTS. You may not.... comments welcome.
Dont forget, the resizers are ONLY needed for people who dont bother to load em up the correct size anyway. I reccomend 640x480 max.
The last resizer we had caused problems with a few browsers and also slowed the load down and technically loaded the page twice so we removed it and Pet worked on a new one.
Now, the pictures will all load into a 640x480 thumbnail.
When you move the mouse over the thumbnail it will jump up to the size it was originally uploaded at.
Try it here:
https://passionford.com/forum/viewto...r=asc&start=40
Remember, you will have to get into the habit of keeping the mouse to the left or right of picture topics if we keep this mod so the pics scroll by undisturbed on your screen.
I like it LOTS. You may not.... comments welcome.
Dont forget, the resizers are ONLY needed for people who dont bother to load em up the correct size anyway. I reccomend 640x480 max.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Originally Posted by Graceland
https://passionford.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=153830
another good thread to test it out on

another good thread to test it out on
One word: Brilliant
What would happen if the picture was physically larger than your screen though, would you be able to scroll around to see it in full ?
Agree with what you said though stu, as soon as image resizing was available, every uploaded pictures was loadsamegabytes big, can't be good for 56k users.
PS: With photobucket you can get thumbnails on the post, with a link to the full size one, imo that's the best option, thumbnails are big enough to see if you want to load the full size picture or not.
e.g. Click for full size
What would happen if the picture was physically larger than your screen though, would you be able to scroll around to see it in full ?
Agree with what you said though stu, as soon as image resizing was available, every uploaded pictures was loadsamegabytes big, can't be good for 56k users.
PS: With photobucket you can get thumbnails on the post, with a link to the full size one, imo that's the best option, thumbnails are big enough to see if you want to load the full size picture or not.
e.g. Click for full size
Thread Starter
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
What would happen if the picture was physically larger than your screen though, would you be able to scroll around to see it in full ?
The ULTIMATE solution is to educate users to resize their pics, not only dimensionally but physically too, but after years of trying i have accepted its never going to happen
Thread Starter
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
What would happen if the picture was physically larger than your screen though, would you be able to scroll around to see it in full ?


Or of course you can "Right mouse, save as"
Personally I don't like it.
I find it quite offputting when scrolling down the screen, and the page keeps jumping about from size to size.
The old system was far superior, as it kept pictures to a slightly smaller size, but obviously I can appreciate the problems it caused.
Not a fan
I find it quite offputting when scrolling down the screen, and the page keeps jumping about from size to size.
The old system was far superior, as it kept pictures to a slightly smaller size, but obviously I can appreciate the problems it caused.
Not a fan
Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
What would happen if the picture was physically larger than your screen though, would you be able to scroll around to see it in full ?
The ULTIMATE solution is to educate users to resize their pics, not only dimensionally but physically too, but after years of trying i have accepted its never going to happen

Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
Originally Posted by Graceland
https://passionford.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=153830
another good thread to test it out on

another good thread to test it out on
Very good feature! IMO it would be perfect if it changed size on clicking it like the old one.
Alternatively....... would it easier to just put a limit on the number of letters per line so that even if people did put massive photos on you could still read all the text with no problems
Alternatively....... would it easier to just put a limit on the number of letters per line so that even if people did put massive photos on you could still read all the text with no problems
Thread Starter
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
One thing we could change, is to simply stop it resizing back to normal on mouseover so ALL it does is resize everyones pics to 640x480.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
Have to agree that thumbnail size pics would be better. Would it be possible to have pics as attachments and say a px or kb limit and you have to physically click on them rather than mouseover?
I find it a bit too much with pics and sigs, having only a laptop at the mo. It's only possible sometimes to view one reply at a time on the screen.
Will the facility to turn off sigs be coming back Stu?
I find it a bit too much with pics and sigs, having only a laptop at the mo. It's only possible sometimes to view one reply at a time on the screen.
Will the facility to turn off sigs be coming back Stu?
Thread Starter
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
I may ask Pet to play about some more with this one then
Lynne, Yes, i had forgotten about that as i never used it, but your right, we need that incorporating back as well
Lynne, Yes, i had forgotten about that as i never used it, but your right, we need that incorporating back as well



for more input.
