I want to get this point across, SCS are a very good respected tuning company, my grevience was through a lack of communication that is all.

I am not out to slander anyone and did not want the other post to go that route, i do constantly make comment ref the rainbird saff, this is not a go at SCS its the fact i bought it worn out.

I know the majority dont care/beleive about what i say but some might who dont speak out, i say again SCS you can trust with your car.

 

Fair play phil for clearing that up i wouldnt have been happy myself if i had bought it either but it would have been nothing to do with harvey its not his place to say if a customer of his 's car is worn out.

 

To ad he couldnt have won either way ! you or the previous owner would have been pissed

 

I'd of been a bit pissed aswell if it had of been my money aswell. Stupid question,,, But did you not drive it before you handed cash over?

 

Has Mike threatened you with your 7th life time ban Phil.
Should have bought a MAD car you can slate them as much as you like on here but SCS thats different, they have MP (Mikes Protection) status on here.
Sounds like pressure is being applied to me.

 

Yep, cos a thread like this will definately help! Its only going to drag the issue out again.

Why you even felt the need to mention it if you genuinely didn't want it brought up is also odd.

 

no mate it was my fault i bought it blind because it was the "rainbird 180mph saff" Paul got it delivered to me...i just paid and that was it...things started to get revealed later, but as said i spose it wasnt harveys place to tell me it was worn out.

Rod no pressure at all, i want no bad blood anywhere, the old days are over.

 

Not at all, i am actually apologising to SCS in my own way and my threads get many many views so people will see this ans know that SCS are ok to use (just incase folk are put off them by my post being dragged up)

 

Let sleeping dogs lie. Or alternatively bring it up again.....