If you had to choose between performance or looks????
Thread Starter
PassionFord's crazy fool!
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 7,102
Likes: 0
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire
OK, I'm just intrigued as to which route people would follow here. If you had a car that was totally standard, steelies, normal bumpers etc and you had an amount of cash to spend that would either get you something performance enhancing like a cam kit and throttle bodies or you could buy a new set of alloys and a nice (non max power) body kit and sex the car up, what would you do?
Drive a fast crappy looking car, or drive a slower nice looking car?
I would go for looks as a standard Escort or Mondeo just wouldn't do it for me looks-wise.
Drive a fast crappy looking car, or drive a slower nice looking car?
I would go for looks as a standard Escort or Mondeo just wouldn't do it for me looks-wise.
well considering i drive an old sierra LX with a cracked rear bumper and steelies i've got to say performance over looks, although, my car ain't that rapid either
defo performance before looks though, without a doubt!
defo performance before looks though, without a doubt!
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Its the same as the age old question with birds, which is better:
fat bird that goes like hell
fit bird who just lies there
fat bird that goes like hell
fit bird who just lies there
If we talking birds, then the minter that lies there like a sack of spuds wins easy for me.
Its WHO im fucking thats turns me on, what they look like, WHO i got my cock inside is whats making me cum, some minter doing owt is FAR better than some fat mo fo giving the full on porno treatment.
Might lie there, but do a good job on em and even the most inactive piece will be making a right row and bucking around like they plugged into the mains...
All about wot power u got.Also havin a nice lookin car wiv loads spent on the outside making it look gud,u always worrie about where u park it.
Thats what i like about mine just looks like a lil old escort.but i know its not a lil 1.3
pmsl at steve
Thats what i like about mine just looks like a lil old escort.but i know its not a lil 1.3
pmsl at steve
performance every time - im not 17 any more!
having said that im not really interested in a sleeper with a cossie lump unless im minted and have loads of cars. it has to be a cossie on the outside as well as under the bonnet for me!
having said that im not really interested in a sleeper with a cossie lump unless im minted and have loads of cars. it has to be a cossie on the outside as well as under the bonnet for me!
to me its a fair obviuos question.when your young you find the insurance a killer so turn to making it look good .thenafter a few years we have a bit of both .then we get greedy in a good way and have it all looks and performance ie cossie or evo and scooby.nah forget about the last two good performance but friggin ugly
Definately performance, although I wouldn't want a "proper" engine sitting in a total bucket of a car - i.e. first time you put your foot down the engine / box detach themselves from the chassis !
There's nowt wrong with a standard looking motor with grunt though
There's nowt wrong with a standard looking motor with grunt though
Originally Posted by Hofajoab
That thing's a rust bucket but jesus christ! looks like an absolute mission as well!
Thread Starter
PassionFord's crazy fool!
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 7,102
Likes: 0
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire
having said that im not really interested in a sleeper with a cossie lump unless im minted and have loads of cars. it has to be a cossie on the outside as well as under the bonnet for me!



You a funny coont 