What is tackyier a Ford Sapphire cosworth or a Mazda RX7 gen 3.

Cheers
Woody

 

Defo mazda! like you have to ask! lol

 

saff .. mazda .. hmmm .. hard choice.. ... lookin at the pair sat together its the saff ..deffo

 

There is no comparism,sapphire is far tackier and anyone who says it isnt,has got the old ford blinkers on.

mark

 

if you mean tacky as in sticky, deffo the Ford. But only because bits fall off and have to be glued back on

Personally I think RX7's can be a bit tacky looking... there's a green one lives on the A3 up near the Robin Hood roundabout and it's hideous....

But then 10 years ago people thought Saffs, Escorts etc were a bit pikey so who knows, it's all subjective.

 

Dont think you can call either tacky tbh. Trouble is if you put both mint std samples of the cars side by side then they both look cool. But they you can get so horrible moddified cars. And this would prob go agianst the Serria as there litteral thousands of them compared to the RX.

 

What an odd question...


I 100% agree with that, neither are "tacky" cars but if I had to choose I would say the Mazda on the reasoning you're probably 100 times more likely to find some RX-7 with some tacky neons and some lurid over-sized body kit which doesn't fit properly than your likely to find a Sapphire Cosworth with any tacky body modifications.

If your asking which one looks better as standard.. personally I think the RX-7 looks an amazing car, probably one of the best car designs.

 

RX7's are stunning looking cars IMO. Nice proportions.

 

RX7 is better looking all day long, neither are 'tacky' IMO though