General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Rover failed m.o.t on emmisions... why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #1  
andre_k's Avatar
andre_k
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 0
From: Lincs
Default Rover failed m.o.t on emmisions... why?

my mams rover 820, on a n-plate, just failed her m.o.t...


''rear exhaust box has a major leak of exhaust gasses''

''emmisions co content high at idle''


'' '' '' '' after 2nd idle excessive''

lamda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified value.


3.56% co at natural idle (should be under 0.5%)

2nd fast idle co 4.807% (should be under 0.3%)



what could cause this? the exhaust(though i doubt it)?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 05:49 PM
  #2  
Doug's Avatar
Doug
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: Shropshirsestashire
Default

Put a back box on it
Your getting an intake of oxygen hence why it has failed
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 06:10 PM
  #3  
Jamz's Avatar
Jamz
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 0
From: Naaaaarch
Default

I didn't think they would even test the emissions if there was a leak somewhere....
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 06:22 PM
  #4  
andre_k's Avatar
andre_k
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 0
From: Lincs
Default

ok, thanks
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #5  
Doug's Avatar
Doug
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: Shropshirsestashire
Default

Originally Posted by Jamz
I didn't think they would even test the emissions if there was a leak somewhere....
In most cases thats correct not sure why they have this time ?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 09:06 PM
  #6  
TrickyDicky's Avatar
TrickyDicky
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: WALSALL/CANNOCK, West Mids
Default

Originally Posted by Jamz
I didn't think they would even test the emissions if there was a leak somewhere....
most stations do if car has failed on anything else, as if theyd failed it on say a broken spring and exhaust blowing and youve fixed both but then on retest fails emisions you could argue that it never failed emissions first time round, so they test emissions and say its failed but "could" be due to blow in exhaust etc.

hth

Tricky
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 04:27 AM
  #7  
richm's Avatar
richm
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire UK
Default

very unlikely that a leak that far back in the exhaust and that far away from the lambda sensor would cause the rich readings.
It "could" be a faulty lambda sensor, but also have a good check round the pipework that connects the MAP sensor (which is in the ECU, pipe comes off the ECU) to the inlet manifold. A small leak here can make the MAP sensor read a higher pressure than is actually there and overfuel.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 06:26 AM
  #8  
the original's Avatar
the original
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: NWFP
Default

like rich says
an exhaust blow will cause the lambda to be high
however it would also drop the co, not raise it
so you have some other fault as well
regardless of the cause,if you have used it a lot the catalytic converter is probably now destroyed by the fuel so will probably need replacing once you have repaired the fault
rovers are the worst engines for this type of thing unfortunately
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AJC
Cars for Sale
1
Oct 1, 2015 06:47 PM
SMILER258
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
36
Sep 28, 2015 09:04 AM
oldskooldanrst
General Car Related Discussion.
9
Sep 27, 2015 04:02 PM
Pwrs2k
General Car Related Discussion.
23
Sep 26, 2015 09:45 AM
dange
Ford Mondeo Including ST
3
Sep 23, 2015 12:11 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04 PM.