View Single Post
Old Jul 14, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #34  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by SPADGE
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Spadge, if you look on the original post it says in bold "IF"

So have one of these mate


From reading what he put i dont think he will do the guy over, was just putting what he could be called if im proved wrong.
Ehhhhh
I have quoted exactly what you put so what are you talking about???
My point was that one minute you are telling me i am banging on and sticking up for the bloke and the next you are taking the piss out of him as in your posts above Like i said 'shallow' anyone!

Im really not sure what the "Ehhhh" was for there, which bit didnt you understand?



In the other thread you were telling him to do a load of things he had already agreed to do so, i was saying to give him a chance to do what he has said first before having a got at him for not doing it.

In this thread the original question was IF at a later date in the future, nothing to do with his intentions currently (for which i feel he should be given the benefit of the doubt) he turns out to in fact be the rotter that i was saying for now we shoul give him the doubt of not being, what should he then be called?

So i was coming up with suggestions for IF he proves to be a wrong'un i wasnt in anyway saying that i felt he was going to prove so.


Seems very obvious to me, not sure why you cant get your head round the difference????
Reply