Umm, some of you seem to be missing the point somewhat, he hasnt been found innocent, they simply ruled that they didnt have enough firm evidence to convict him, due to the way his legal team discredited witnesses and evidence etc.

There was a case in the uk a few years ago of a paedophile where the police actually found video tapes of him abusing little girls etc, but they did so without a warrant and therefore the tapes were illegally obtained and inadmissable, so he got to walk free, but that doesnt make him innocent as he still blatantly did it.