View Single Post
Old Feb 6, 2020 | 10:39 PM
  #14  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack
I would have expected more torque from a 552bhp motor? Why would that be? Obvs bhp is a multiple of torque x revs...so, it must be high revving late power???

nice car but a lot of money
I'm pretty sure it made a lot more torque when it was first mapped on the engine dyno but they mapped it out as it's 2wd and it would of been impossible to put the power down.
Reply