Originally Posted by
scoooby slayer
It baffles me a bit they say 3.0, big valves and big cams which would surely hurt response for more flow at high rpm, but then say it's making boost at 2400 rpm with virtually no lag !
The 0-60 in 3 seconds proves nothing I've done 3.2 with a stick shift h and 550 hp over 1.5 ton car
Id like to see some stats for it as 100-200 kph should be easily below 4 seconds for 950 hp in that car with sequential flat shift around 1.5 ton
I love it looks a fast car and great fun, but 950 hp, boost at 2400 rpm all from a 3 litre on pump fuel I didn't know it was possible to have all three of those things in a sentence, I would say only 2 of those things are physically possible .........
which 2 do you think? I'd like to think its genuinehand all true. Would like to see some states and graphs for it