View Single Post
Old Oct 1, 2014 | 01:00 PM
  #30  
cossynut2's Avatar
cossynut2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 4,587
Likes: 403
From: Holbury,Southampton
Default

Originally Posted by 3FRD
I had the touring, recently sold at grassicks perth as an approved used bmw with 2 year warranty, whoever bought it will certainly need it.

I loved the car, only downsides were the gearbox and the fact it would cut the power mid drift if the foot brake was applied. For most people driving style/skills it wouldn't matter. Gearbox was good when flatout and did what you told it up and down the gears. I'd have prefered manual but not available.

I had a few problems, most down to hard use/abuse.

As for fuel, possibly the worst car I've ever owned on fuel. My average mpg over around 10/15k miles was 9.Xmpg, 15mpg on a decent normal run. Usually hovered around 10/11mpg in town driving. A fast run would read 7mpg which is as low as the mpg calculator would so probably worse. So to sum is crap on fuel but to be expected on a car that easily does 200mph.

As for the original question, M3 no brainer. V8 M3 is alot better on fuel than the M5, average 18/20, 24/25mpg on a run. Obviously these figures are alot worse if driven hard everywhere.
Sorry ,what sort of BMW did you own that"" easily does 200 mph ", as far as i am aware the only one that can get near that is an M5 with its speed restrictor bypassed ?

Last edited by cossynut2; Oct 1, 2014 at 01:09 PM. Reason: left a bit out
Reply