Originally Posted by
Moonstone Steve.
If you look at the two graphs on here that show it at 491 and 439bhp the car had covered less than 250 miles mostly driven easy as thats how I treat the car with the odd bash with the 4i
The noticeable difference with the car was felt slower, used oil and smoked heavier under full throttle high speed applications, this was all before the vacuum hose problem which incidentally wasn't the fpr pipe it was the dump valve pipe.
Steve
Youve now changed your mind again to where the vacuum pipe has come off???
where was the dump valve linked into??maybe there was problems with that and where it was linked??
Where is all the dyno runs info,boost,inlet temps etc etc to compare..
Most of all when was that engine built and how many miles had it done before it was mapped and see some boost??
Maybe the engine had been pretty worn or even damaged before it had seen proper boost??
Originally Posted by
foreigneRS
how ironic
all spot on
it's not even difficult to write the breakpoints in correctly. i wrote an excel file once that can read in the binary file, you can change any breakpoints or map values in excel and then save it again in binary format to be burned to a chip. the weber files are that simple (until you get involved in checksums etc as stu has already pointed out)
More than one person has said clearly with out actually testing the said engine with the said map that any off the points you two are waffling on about are relivant to this argument???
cheers danny