So you feel it's ok for the law to prosecute and convict with inaccurate and sometimes totally wrong evidence ?

IMO if the public are not allowed to make mistakes, then no way should the law be allowed to make mistakes when preparing a prosecution file.

There was a ballbag cop on a local forum who had that attitude. Even to the extent where cops got dates wrong, registrations wrong, locations wrong, names, DOB's wrong etc etc. Yet he still thought it right that despite major errors, the prosecution should still be valid.

Should it fuck. If a dumb ass cop cant even take basic details down accurately, how the fuck can they be trusted with anything they are saying or writing down ? Isnt evidence used for prosecutions supposed to be based on fact, and accurate ?
There are enough cops making up shit to nail people, we dont need to encourage it.

IMO if a cop does make mistakes like that, then their ability to do the job needs questioned. If they are so incompetent, then no way should they be in that job in the first place.

We arent allowed to make mistakes on the road, so no way should they be allowed to when trying to nail us.