Thread: Laser Jammers
View Single Post
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #11  
Disabled Account's Avatar
Disabled Account
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Default

Police statement:

"There are two other types of devices that we are seeking to ban. The first is the jammers. These devices prevent cameras from working by deflecting the beam issued by the camera equipment or preventing the beam from emitting. They are particularly dangerous in that they prevent speed enforcement cameras from operating and therefore allowing drivers to continue to speed past the camera site. Also contained within this definition are those sprays, materials, etc that obstruct the view of a number plate.

"We are also seeking to ban the carriage of radar detectors. These identify where cameras are by sending out a radar beam that detects the signal emitted by the camera equipment. There are two problems with these -

They can set off non-camera equipment such as automatic doors and may interfere with satellite TV
More importantly, the police have genuine concerns about the use of detectors. In addition to camera deployment within the safety camera cost recovery scheme the police also undertake covert activity and speed limit enforcement as part of their normal traffic duties. The fact that these devices can detect both covert camera activity and non-camera/cost recovery laser/radar guns could seriously effect their ability to enforce speed limits as part of their normal traffic duties."

Radar Detector Shop
10 Pentland Close, Hazel Grove, Stockport, Cheshire, SK7 5BS
Copyright 2001-2004. All rights reserved.
Reply