Originally Posted by
Jay_
you have removed and re writen that post 3 times to my knowledge even westy picked up on it that you mentioned chop's twat comment
Nope, I havent removed the post at all mate, it was removed by a moderator not by me, as I said, ask in the mods room if you need to know which one.
Yes as per my reply above that you dont seem to have bothered reading so im not quite sure why you keep replying to me, I wasnt aware of the other infractions as the time I wrote the first post, so after my post was deleted (NOT by me) I altered that bit when I rewrote it as I now knew it to be inaccurate.
3 different mods dealt with 3 different cases of abuse on this thread who were the only ones on line all 3 have been dealt with by the rules
Well in my case that actually isnt the case, as I engaged in banter with paul where I said his name read like it said "specialist arse" and he engaged in banter back saying I was probably middle aged, and one of us received an infraction for it, when of course it should have been neither.
ah i see where your coming from now we banned rsnut but gave you and chop 5 points each for abusive behavour really then in your eyes we need to ban all 3 of you
If chop was as insulting as rsnut then he should receive the same punishment, although I would be inclined to think that in both cases it should be just points as a ban is so over the top over something so trivial, and in the case of me and pete who were clearly both just engaging in friendly banter I think that we should also have received the same punishment or lack of punishment rather than it being only one of us.
But as per my reply above, i do think if you want to discuss the specifics in infinite detail you would be better off doing so on the thread that already exists as although discussing the concept of fair moderation is very relevant to this thread I feel that going into too much detail could detract from that benefit.