View Single Post
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 02:18 PM
  #20  
foreigneRS's Avatar
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,597
Likes: 24
From: W. Sussex
Default

doesn't look as good as the techedge unit that has better datalogging facility with more inputs (including thermocouples).

taken from https://passionford.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=97080

just found a comparison of various ones here:

http://www.billwilner.com/mx5fi411/wbo2.html

particularly interesting is this comment:

Quote:


..easy to obtain and inexpensive Bosch LSU4 sensor. The Bosch is a true wideband sensor with 5 wires. We have observed that the response time is about half that of the NTK sensor. Note that this sensor cannot read quite as rich as the NTK and pins at 10.5 AFR.
any comment on that stu?

i think that both the bosch LSU4 and NTK L1H1 sensors can be used with most wb controllers, do you know if that's the case with the one you're testing? if so, do you have a recomendation on which sensor to use (bearing in mind that the NTK costs double the Bosch)?

One more general question if i may - does anti-lag damage an O2 sensor? obviously bunging unburnt fuel down the exhaust damages a cat (not to mention the shockwaves), but does it harm the O2 sensor?
Reply