but surely the argument is not that the level of cover drops from 3rd party to Zero when on the ring, but that the act of going to the ring would consider your main policy invalid and therefore also any 3rd party extension of it?

im sure tony said something along that lines that the insurers can deny cover for specific circumstances/exclusions and that also not disclosing information about what you intend to do could also consider a breach?


ie the moment i turn up at the nurburgring my main policy is invalid, therefore i have no cover?