Originally Posted by
CRAIG HAYTER
thanks,i have to emphasise,the car was not damaged whatsoever,when it was found the only thing missing was the interior,and because the car was 17 years old at the time the insurance estimated the cost or impossiblity of finding a new interior was higher than the value of the car,hnce it fell into the category of cat c,if it had a bit of lock damage and a scuffed bumper it would have been cat d,but it didnt even have that.i would far rather have a cat listted car that was mint than a rusty well used shed with clear history!