Originally Posted by
O.K.C
Zetecboy
You mention loads of cars that the aftermarket Pectel system is fitted to now not so long ago they were all running weber, but compare the amount of money that most people can spend to that of touring car teams, lemans teams and WRC teams which have sponsers and advertising to cover high costs for components. Unlike us mortals that have to work for our money we can spend. Im not saying that any tuner is better or worse, if its done right the end result is the same.
The weber ECU was used on Ford and lancia rally cars, lots of teams are still using them and most tuners support the tuning for the system at a decent price. Companys are still offering new parts and designing new parts even now!
Its a factory fit on so many engines such as Fiat, Alfa, Duccati, Ferrari, Ford, Lancia to name just a few. Webcon are still selling the ECU's new and being used for aftermarket application on many cars we dont even know about. It keeps coming back to price, a £50 L6 ECU runs my engine just fine.
Morph.
jano uses an emulator to map cars without pectel software.
i dont think that ford used weber when in touring cars with the rs 500 iam sure that they used a aftermarket management systems infact it was zytek and i know this because there factory is down the road from me and they do lemans style cars now . also the orginal question was jano says fit cossie management and cost wasnt even mentioned he was asking which was best and the simple answer is pectel is a far superior ecu in every way. i do understand the big budgets in motorsports teams but they use the t2 in moto gp so i dont think a £650 is a touch in the ocean in terms of budget they could have used t6 etc so that must mean that the t2 is very suitable for the needs of high end motorsports.