Originally Posted by
C4llyT
Surely he would say his dad owned it, as opposed to saying he owned it and getting in the shit, would this not be a wise move?
It's his dads car, he can drive it as he's insured to drive other cars.
I agree he's a dick, but proving other than the above I doubt is easy.
insurance comanys can use anything from speed cams to speed trackers. they will figger it out and find that his son was driving the car as his own use, eather way hell be fucked over him or his dad