Originally Posted by
C4llyT
Yep, it's what they can prove that counts, which is fuck all.
The fact is hes committing fraud.
Proving it in a court of law is a different thing.
Its the moral principal in my eyes. Sure he might get away with it for a couple of police stops, but he will eventually get caught and if the insurance fraud people chose to investigate him hed get fucked.
Originally Posted by
C4llyT
People getting their knickers in a twist with if's and but's, doesn't count for a thing really.
By that same logic does it make it OK for paedophiles to rape children if they can get away with it because it cant be prooved??
Does it make daterape OK because its hard to proove???
When does breaking the law become ok or become morally wrong just because you can get away with it? where do you draw the line???