View Single Post
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #31  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by Will @ M Developments
Thought the bits looked proper

What displacement does it give ultimately? The RC stroker kits - whilst giving 2.4 capacity did mean a modification to the bottom of the cylinder bore wall to ensure rotational clearance - fairly extreme rod angles considering we revved them to over 9k at times
2.227lt from mem, I also have a 94mm crank with 3mm longer rods if they want to realy rev the nuts off it,
The 97mm is safe for over 8k and if needed 9k would be ok but at those revs it will wear the pistons out but it is much safer than the 2.4 at those revs,
I have never had one problem with any of the Evo engines I have ever biultthey have been bullet proof.

Mark
Reply