Originally Posted by
tabetha
It is a complete MYTH that the other car needs to be insured(on it's own policy), it does not at all, so long as legal(mot/tax etc).
Well i thought that was a glimmer of hope for him, but sadly the pratt did own the car at the time.
I know it might sound ignorance but he did GENUINLY believe he was properly insured, he's not the type of bloke to go and do this sort of thing full well knowing he hasnt got proper cover.
I think im gona get him to ring his insurance company and see where he stands on this one, but the general consensus seems to be anal surgery.
Would it just be better for him to "throw himself at the mercy of the court" then tather than trying to plead his thought on insurance with them???