Originally Posted by
dojj
the bloke sitting behind the desk is going to ask you one question:
"if you thought it was a 70 mph nsl road why were you doing 40mph?"
I didnt think it was a 70mph road, I thought it was a 40mph road, hence the reason I was doing 40mph
as most of the dual carriage-way's I've ever driven on are between 40-70mph, dont ever recall a 30mph one!
Originally Posted by
dojj
if they have the evidence but don't show you how are you supposed to know what to contest?
Exactly my point!
put it in writing that there is no evidence and that one single sloitary picture with no speed showing does not consitute reasonable grounds for this alleged prosecution and see what they say
Already have. I've asked to see the video but they have said no way, only in court, and they have said that they -will- send me an image with the speed on, but they wouldnt normally do this, my reply back was obviously why not, as if they are going to go to the expense of sending out an image in the first place saying you have been clocked at speed X, why not send out the image with speed X showing also, unless there is an hidden agenda in hoping that people will then go to court, still lose, but pay more in costs, keeping the police revenue fund even more topped up maybe...
Mitsy, is that you Tony? God you still around (both on this earth and in business?) if so I'm shocked! pmsl