View Single Post
Old Oct 28, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #20  
richm's Avatar
richm
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire UK
Default

Originally Posted by m_nettleship
Thanks 4 the Help.

Just so i understand, did the 4x4 sit 25mm higher than the 2wd. Standard?

So if u lowered a 4x4 by -25mm then it wud be standard ride hight on a 2wd. Is this correct. Need to no the Facts B4 i send a e-mail bk to Avo.

Simon Said that its way to Low. I sent him that picture. I will talk to him monday, maybe ask him about this poster on wall.

Yes the Car Is sat on 18s.
Yeah - AVO list three spring sets for Cosworth Sapph in order of low to high:
30-025 = 2wd -25mm
30-026 = 2wd STD AND 4x4 -25mm
30-029 = 4wd STD

4x4 as factory standard evidently sits 25mm higher than 2wd (rear certainly does - my original springs were a bit knackered so front sat a bit low anyway) so in my case Simon reccomended I use 30-026 kit which lowers 4x4 by 25mm to bring in line with STD 2WD (this same kit is listed for both applications) and the result is as you see in my pictures above.
But If your kit is supposed to be just 25mm lower than mine again, it still looks very low to me IMO.
It was a few years ago now, but the poster was on the wall just to the left of the entrance door - the blu-tac may have dried up by now and it's fallen down LOL
Reply