View Single Post
Old 02-04-2007, 04:59 PM
  #107  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Phil, if you could just answer the question as to why BD10s (which lose you bottom end torque) and bigger ports (which lose you bottom end torque) are NOT a compromise, but that a 2psi cap on boost for 1000rpm of the rev range IS a compromimse, that would be great, cause at the moment you are saying one is a compromise and one isnt, and I cant understand your thinking for that?

Why is getting rid of surge by putting in a bigger cam somehow more acceptable than getting rid of surge by altering the boost map slightly?



As for your comment that "an engine doesnt have to be a compromise" can you name one that isnt? cause I can think of NO engine in existance that isnt a compromise in multiple ways.