so, to clarify, someone who has paid up and has the "trader" stamp next to their name can have other people with a sig with their name in it

others, who haven't paid up and don't have the "trader" stamp nex tot heir name would be moderated?

so, for example, reyland has apid so people can put reyland in their sigs, but chips chips haven't paid so someone who bigged up chips chips would have their sig removed?

is that the jist of the proposal?

ok, so what about people who run their own companies but DON'T have anything to do with cars? we have a fair few builders here and i know that, in the past, their sigs have been "modified" to put it another way

would they now be able to put their names back on their sigs again? or does the pf ruling for traders apply to everyone?

and, on that basis, if someone has got a non ford car that has been tuned by a non pf posting company, would they also have their sigs modified? an astra that says "tuned by halfords" for example?

if the rules are explained in a simple and understandable way then i have no problem with it, but my cars got a big "dojj motorsport" sticker on the front which does to my blog (which reminds me, haven't updated it for weeks and weeks) so would that be edited to make it abide by the rules?

it seems that this rule is going to be all encomapsing which, to be fair, is what it hsoudl be, but then you are going to get the smaller infreingments (possibly like mine) which will also be treated as "fair game" to the sig inquisition

it's going to be difficult to police and, perhaps i may venture an onion here, a pm or the like to those people who break the rules and asking them to edit their sigs may be a better corse of action rather than just a sweeping name change and sig cull that it sounds like you are planning would be a better idea?

thank you for taking the time to read this