Originally Posted by Rick
How will it be more reliable? And give better consumption?
Continous injection system have incredibly good control over transients, and the atomisation of fuel is superior to electronic injectors. The problem you have with KE, is that it can only be calibrated over a small range of load. The MF2 sorts this by looking after all the on boost fuelling, while the the KE provides perfect off boost control.
There is a lot more to Efi converisons than a simple swap. Who is going to Map it? And are they any good? In the grand scheme of things probably not. Manufactures spend 1000's of man hours mapping an engine - so how a so called tuner can do it in an afternoon is comical.
through my experience ke is unbelievably temperamental. it needs adjusting every five minutes as the slightest little thing throws it out. i would prefer to run an efi system that doesn't spit it's dummy everytime it's thursday instead of constantly paying out money to have my mfi set up re-calibrated. if the fifth injector route is so good then why don't the big manufacturers still use it? or for that matter race teams? the simple facts are it is an unreliable system that thankfully was very short lived and was superseded by a far better series of systems. and on the front of economy, a closed loop lamba set up is by far a much more efficient system as it allows the ecu to constantly evaluate and adjust itself by not simply relying on air flow or manifold absolute pressure.