The ONLY way the anal bloke could be convicted is if there is his (and only his) DNA up her bum.

If both where there, they technically could say one put his sperm on the others nob and he stuck it up her. If the other then says the exact same, its down to the jury to decide who. But then how can they be sure beyond reasonable doubt, when its one bloke of questionalble character, versus another? Ofc ourse the jury could then be put the point they both bummed her? But if shes already said that didn't happen, then they can't take that route.

Are they going to do another on a different topic, thats not such a nest of worms?