Originally Posted by RS-Leigh
Originally Posted by philram
Originally Posted by RS-Leigh
I did enjoy it....
Stan Collynore was a complete twat though, he had made is mind up before it even started, you could see he has no respect for woman by the way he spoke at them and continually tried to put them down.
Magaman!!!!! Get a fuckin real name you cock!!! He had the same attitude as Collymore.
Overall I don't think they could have made another decision, although I do believe she was raped by the second guy and maybe even the first but it was not fully proven.
Is there another show to tell you what the truth was????
Leigh
their is no truth, it was pure fiction, alot of improvising was done by the actors during the trail..
I know it was fiction mate, that ws the whole point of the show.
I thought there was going to be another show to tell you if the fictional story was that she had been raped or not. That way they would know if it was real did they make the correct decision.
Leigh
Didnt actually see it
BUT
Even IF they had used a real life case, then they could still never say if they reached a RIGHT decision, only if they reached the SAME decision as the real life one, who is to say in real life they wouldnt have mad a wrong decision, think that was the aim of the show, just to show what court and hearings were like
NO ONE would know what really happened except the people involved, all could lie and convince a jury of someones giult or innocense
Steve