Originally Posted by Chunk.
Originally Posted by NIL 7717
Originally Posted by Chunk.
Yeah, if it was a 4x4 cossie against the Pulsar, I would say the Pulsar would have the edge, maybe, it would be alot closer.
I remember someone saying that a good stage 1 2wd will stay with a stage 3 4x4, so judging by that Pulsar should be the winner.
i disagree there.my mate had his engine built to 350bhp by harvey gibbs in his 2wd i had mine chipped etc by harvey and ran the same power.my mates was dyno proven and you couldnt seperate the two on the road.his rwd my 4x4.no difference what so ever.
I find that hard to believe, not that stranger things havnt happpened.
But 2 cars, same power, in gear acceleration, 1 is lighter and produces more power at the wheels but it wasnt faster?
Something is wrong imo, but like I said, not saying your talking rubbish or anything, just find it hard to swallow thats all.
hand on my heart mate.pissed my mate off something cronic after spunking 6k on a rebuild.
unless mine was pushing a bit more but mines on t34 greens 3 bar -31 bajoo chip so should have made the same as his?