View Single Post
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:12 PM
  #32  
fuzzy's Avatar
fuzzy
14000+ post superhero
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 17,461
Likes: 490
From: upside down in a field
Default

once again another child is killed by one of these types of dog,no doubt tomorrow papers will be full of the animal lovers saying that they are misunderstood,loving pets,itll die down for a while until another child is killed in future just so the stereotypical council deviant type with his sovereign ring on every finger can walk around with one of these beasts thinking he's hard as fuck.why have animals like these as pets in the first place ,especially when you have children in the family or close by.can the dog owner be charged with causing the death or failing to stop the death of a child caused by their 'pet'? .r.i.p.
Reply