View Single Post
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #12  
Christian and Beccy's Avatar
Christian and Beccy
#1 in Spelling Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,329
Likes: 6
From: Norfolk
Default

Originally Posted by turboloon
Originally Posted by vroooom ptssssh
I wouldnt say one of the best RST's, it never produced the power it was claimed to have, not even near it infact. . .
every body to there own mate i liked the sheer look of the thing as for power one o the guys up here had a m3 beemer he couldn't get past so i reckon it defo had the power it claimed ,the m3 is about 320bhp!!!!!in performance ford it was quoted as having 270bhp with 320 ft lbs torque still fucking impressive
So, let me understand this correctly......

Just because an M3 has 320bhp, and cannot pass a specific RS Turbo, does that mean that the RS Turbo must have more than 320bhp?

Can I explain a simple concept. Power-to-weight.

The RS Turbo weighs about the same as the M3 does, but before they fitted the engine, so a 'PROPER' 250bhp RS Turbo should do away with an M3. I don't mean one of the many 'wannabe' 250bhp RS Turbo's either.
Reply