View Single Post
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 11:51 PM
  #39  
Andymancos's Avatar
Andymancos
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: Stoke-on-Trent
Default

Originally Posted by UnseenMenace
Although Intel on paper has a much hyped processor its currently its worth remembering that AMD 64 was two years old by the time Intels Pentium Conroe was released.
in terms of power however the most powerfull dual-core x86 processor in terms of performance-per-watt is still the AMD and this is why Intel never took up AMD on the challenge they made
Although intel can compete on pure performance, they can not compete performance per watt which means that the Intels always require more power to run and create more heat !!

The latest Intel's however do overclock remarkably well even better than the latest from AMD and this has given people the impression its a vastly better processor simply because the geeks are very enthusiastic about it... Stright out the box the story is not the same.

http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-10442_7-6389077-1.html


You do know that a standard clock E6600 (£220) will waste a AMD FX62 (£500) ?????? so where did u get that from
Reply