Originally Posted by trevCOSS
Originally Posted by abc motor sport
treCOSS . well answerd questions mate not having a dig just asking questions
sorry I was going to come back and explain but got caught up, and thought rich would have been right on here anyway. As you know know the car was mapped at MSD recently, Im sure rich was more than aware what kind of result he might get with the choice of parts, I suppose you could say he's future proofing it, all it needs now is a the right head & cams to make the most of the ancillary components, which where chosen for there good prices and availability (largely second hand from here) as well as the ability to do more in the future. The car is as you say a bit laggy but drives very well and feels much better than the curve posted might suggest.
Hi Danny, the final spec changed alot from the original 803s and 23psi boost plan. Like trevCOSS said as we built the car up i bought a lot of bits off Passionford to future proof the engine, for example the injectors flow more than 8x403s but are only on 38% duty when pulling 7000rpm in 4th
Better than running the 803s flat out i think you'll agree
The only thing limiting the power now is the engine internals. Had the engine not only just been run in i would of gone low comp and had some headwork and cams , but that can wait till this one goes pop
