View Single Post
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 07:52 AM
  #17  
biglee's Avatar
biglee
Audio specialist
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 1
From: daventry,northants
Default

Originally Posted by JesseT
This is so the wrong place for this discussion

Being a scientist myself, we don't care if the number is real or not, complex numbers are just a way to make 2D calculations easier to spell out. Then when you want to go 3D, 4D, ... 3x3D etc... tensor calculus comes to play. And still nobody cares if the numbers are real or not. It's just an aggreement to make the syntax look clearer.

To easily understand the basic operations of complex and real numbers, have a look at the geometric interpretation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number
tensor calculus relies on so called imagenary numbers tho doesnt it....?

my argument lies in the fact it can be done....and those so called experts tell ing me it cant,....someone pls explain the correct terminology.
Reply