Gotta love the way more or less everyone jumps straight on the bandwagon and starts judging before they even hear the otherside of the story Nothing being impartial and reasonable is there?

Even if the one side of the story which had been given was totally accurate whats to say it wasn't an isolated case and the trader in question had lots of happy customers? Doesn't mean they should be banned through one incident does it?

Whats the betting if it was a less well known trader they would still be getting grief, its this sort of thing that can cause real harm to the reputation of a business. Also whats the betting if the trader was named in the original post half if not all the people who posted afterwards wouldn't have said what they did?


Sorry but it really pisses me off when people make public comments without even knowing what they hell they are talking about