Originally Posted by reality
Is that why experts use a pwm clamp on the map sensor then to avoid the boost cut rather than doing the chip properly?
Plenty of people use a frequency clamp on many many cars to great effect.
We still use them for CVH's if its a small spec, saves pissing about changing teh processor. They are used by us, HKS, APEXI, JUN to name but a few, on cars ranging from a Subaru to a lancer evolution 8. Funny they all work perfectly well, yet, since you have gone totally off topic with this bizzare redirection are we to assume you think for some reason that a frequency clamp doesnt work or is less effective than changing the processor byte? Lets hear why then...
Also, i guess you decided to drop the closed loop argument and try to sideswipe into a new discussion instead?
