Old Jul 16, 2006 | 09:08 AM
  #13  
xr4x4rs's Avatar
xr4x4rs
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,574
Likes: 3
From: coventry
Default

Originally Posted by MADRod
Originally Posted by xr4x4rs
thats a bit hrassh really

as andy, and eagle say, why insure a car if it doesnt move due to having a resto,

thats the problem im going to have then, as not many people can insure 2 cars

You can insure as many cars as you want, prob is NCB has to start from scratch on the second policy. Ive got 8+years NCB on both of mine & this took a lot of years without an accident,
yea i know that, but when one of your cars is a rs turbo and the other one is a cosy being restored all the ncb will have to go on the cosy as its more value than the rst, but try and insure a rst with no ncb, not going to happen,

there should be a compromise somewhere and not to pay like full whack on a car thats in a million bits and wont be back on the road until about a year later, why pay insurance for a car thats safely in a garage being restored but not being able to use, dont see the point when a sorn declaration is on the databas for police records and dvla that the car is a sorn, obviously if that cars being driven about on a sorn then they should be done for it unless going to tax it

but not why its in a garage

its stupid
Reply