View Single Post
Old Feb 20, 2006 | 07:56 AM
  #55  
turbodaily's Avatar
turbodaily
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ad4m RST
Originally Posted by turbodaily
Originally Posted by andrek12345
Originally Posted by rightstuff
like you all say it is nice to see and old escort show new tricks.BUT over the two i would have the evo.(and i hate jap motors)the transmision is bombproof from what ive heard!! and an evo will always go faster than a cossie......... Fastest cossie is around 10secs,norris's evo is in the low 9's.NOW IN RACING TERMS THAT IS A MASSIVE GAP! On average there must be faster fords than evos out there,but thats cos the fords are getting on now so parts are easyier to get,most of them are modded.give it a couple of years and we will struggle to keep up!!!im just looking at the big picture.


most of what you said there was bullshit matey
sorry but no,your wrong the evo is the faster car,not just in this case but in general.i wont argue the fact any longer

oh and you lot need to open your eyes abit more,there are better and faster cars out there than fords!! its like your all sore losers
wrong...

There are some super fast fords, that can keep up with some of the fastest of jap cars which have a clear advantage in modern engineering but the cosworth foundations keep em going strong. Of course theres faster cars than fords when did anyone claim otherwise. get it straight 1st before stupid comments.

In this case a 18 year old escort which had 132hp from standard now just under 200hp above that beat an 04' or similar evo that was 100hp above standard. Considering the time gap and mechanical advantages etc i'd say this was defintely fair to compare power gains...and the escort won
no,your wrong...

the escort won in what respect? he got past on the straight fair enough,but the evo wasnt far behind and soon went past and vanished into the horizon,if they were to race on the road the evo would be gone before the escort even gets a chance to get near it,and if it were a rolling start the evo would have still beaten it. im not going to argue the fact,that the evo is the quicker car here....

the question was "who won",you say 'considering the time gap and mechanical advantages' but this has nothing to do with who won,your just making excuses for why the evo is faster
Reply